<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (3) TMI 17 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15722</link>
    <description>Incentive payments made under a workers&#039; settlement, over and above statutory bonus, were treated as deductible business expenditure when they were agreed for better performance, smooth working of the mills and to avoid strike action or business disruption. Because the amount was not bonus, section 36(1)(ii) did not apply, and deductibility was examined under section 37 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. On those facts, the payment was regarded as laid out wholly and exclusively for business purposes and allowable as a commercial-expediency expense.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 13:02:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=54722" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (3) TMI 17 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15722</link>
      <description>Incentive payments made under a workers&#039; settlement, over and above statutory bonus, were treated as deductible business expenditure when they were agreed for better performance, smooth working of the mills and to avoid strike action or business disruption. Because the amount was not bonus, section 36(1)(ii) did not apply, and deductibility was examined under section 37 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. On those facts, the payment was regarded as laid out wholly and exclusively for business purposes and allowable as a commercial-expediency expense.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15722</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>