<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 845 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372076</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, determining that the manufacturers were entitled to CENVAT credit on bought-out items during the relevant period. Changes in statutory definitions broadened the scope of eligible inputs, permitting credit on bought-out items used in manufacturing. The orders confirming the demand for CENVAT credit, interest, and penalties were set aside, and the appeals were granted with consequential benefits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2018 05:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=547217" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 845 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372076</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, determining that the manufacturers were entitled to CENVAT credit on bought-out items during the relevant period. Changes in statutory definitions broadened the scope of eligible inputs, permitting credit on bought-out items used in manufacturing. The orders confirming the demand for CENVAT credit, interest, and penalties were set aside, and the appeals were granted with consequential benefits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372076</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>