<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (10) TMI 380 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277668</link>
    <description>A signed document described as a receipt was treated as a binding land sale contract because it recorded the essential terms, including the property, consideration, payment schedule, possession and execution of the sale deed. The court also rejected objections based on lack of mutuality and held that time was not shown to be of the essence against the purchaser, while the agreement was found sufficiently certain in its property description. The purchaser&#039;s averments and evidence established readiness and willingness under Section 16(c) of the Specific Relief Act, so specific performance was granted with directions for execution of the sale deed and delivery of possession on deposit of the balance consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2018 18:08:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=547198" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (10) TMI 380 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277668</link>
      <description>A signed document described as a receipt was treated as a binding land sale contract because it recorded the essential terms, including the property, consideration, payment schedule, possession and execution of the sale deed. The court also rejected objections based on lack of mutuality and held that time was not shown to be of the essence against the purchaser, while the agreement was found sufficiently certain in its property description. The purchaser&#039;s averments and evidence established readiness and willingness under Section 16(c) of the Specific Relief Act, so specific performance was granted with directions for execution of the sale deed and delivery of possession on deposit of the balance consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277668</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>