<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 844 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, MAHARASHTRA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372075</link>
    <description>The Authority affirmed that the MEP activities undertaken by the applicant fall within the definition of a composite supply of works contract under Section 2(119) of the CGST Act. However, the question regarding whether the applicant could charge a GST rate of 12% on MEP activities for a housing project with Infra status was not answered due to the lack of necessary details submitted by the applicant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2025 15:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=547156" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 844 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, MAHARASHTRA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372075</link>
      <description>The Authority affirmed that the MEP activities undertaken by the applicant fall within the definition of a composite supply of works contract under Section 2(119) of the CGST Act. However, the question regarding whether the applicant could charge a GST rate of 12% on MEP activities for a housing project with Infra status was not answered due to the lack of necessary details submitted by the applicant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372075</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>