<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 839 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372070</link>
    <description>The Court allowed the review petition, modifying the judgment to condone the delay in pursuing the remedy before the appellate authority. The petitioner was given two weeks to approach the appellate authority, addressing concerns raised about the delay and ensuring a fair opportunity to seek remedy. This decision aimed to provide a balanced resolution to the issues raised during the legal proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2025 13:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=547151" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 839 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372070</link>
      <description>The Court allowed the review petition, modifying the judgment to condone the delay in pursuing the remedy before the appellate authority. The petitioner was given two weeks to approach the appellate authority, addressing concerns raised about the delay and ensuring a fair opportunity to seek remedy. This decision aimed to provide a balanced resolution to the issues raised during the legal proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372070</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>