<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 814 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372045</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad allowed the appeal, reversing the disallowance under section 40A(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal emphasized that if the genuineness of the transaction is not in doubt, disallowance cannot be made under section 40A(3). The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to delete the addition, highlighting the importance of considering business expediencies in such cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2018 06:38:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=547126" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 814 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372045</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad allowed the appeal, reversing the disallowance under section 40A(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal emphasized that if the genuineness of the transaction is not in doubt, disallowance cannot be made under section 40A(3). The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to delete the addition, highlighting the importance of considering business expediencies in such cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372045</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>