https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372034 A post-investigation corporate restructuring did not justify amendment of the anti-dumping notification by corrigendum because the ownership structure had materially changed and the original factual basis was not restored. The Designated Authority could therefore refuse the requested name change and consequential lower duty treatment, as the alteration was not a mere clerical correction and would require resort to the statutory review framework where applicable. The refusal to amend the notification was upheld. en-us Mon, 03 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 06 Apr 2019 14:37:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372034 A post-investigation corporate restructuring did not justify amendment of the anti-dumping notification by corrigendum because the ownership structure had materially changed and the original factual basis was not restored. The Designated Authority could therefore refuse the requested name change and consequential lower duty treatment, as the alteration was not a mere clerical correction and would require resort to the statutory review framework where applicable. The refusal to amend the notification was upheld. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 03 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372034