https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372025 A candidate seeking exemption from Paper 18 had to prove a valid and timely request, and the court found the record did not support such a request because the online form and handwritten insertion were unreliable and no contemporaneous pleading showed pre-examination exemption sought. The governing prospectus and amendment limited exemption to three successive terms, which the candidate had already exhausted. As a result, no further exemption could be claimed, and the challenge to denial of exemption failed. The court also noted the candidate had not exercised due diligence in checking the applicable examination instructions. en-us Tue, 13 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 17 Dec 2018 06:35:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372025 A candidate seeking exemption from Paper 18 had to prove a valid and timely request, and the court found the record did not support such a request because the online form and handwritten insertion were unreliable and no contemporaneous pleading showed pre-examination exemption sought. The governing prospectus and amendment limited exemption to three successive terms, which the candidate had already exhausted. As a result, no further exemption could be claimed, and the challenge to denial of exemption failed. The court also noted the candidate had not exercised due diligence in checking the applicable examination instructions. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 13 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372025