https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372018 Non-compliance with a Tribunal direction to pay costs for hearing on merits led to dismissal of the appeal. The appellant said a demand draft had been sent to the Commissioner, but there was no confirmation that it had been accepted. At the next hearing, no one appeared for the appellant to verify compliance, and the Departmental Representative stated that the Commissionerate accepts payments only through challans, not demand drafts. As the order to pay costs had not been complied with, the appeal was dismissed. en-us Mon, 16 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 17 Dec 2018 06:35:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372018 Non-compliance with a Tribunal direction to pay costs for hearing on merits led to dismissal of the appeal. The appellant said a demand draft had been sent to the Commissioner, but there was no confirmation that it had been accepted. At the next hearing, no one appeared for the appellant to verify compliance, and the Departmental Representative stated that the Commissionerate accepts payments only through challans, not demand drafts. As the order to pay costs had not been complied with, the appeal was dismissed. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 16 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372018