https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372012 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, overturning the department's decision. It found no evidence of fraudulent intent as discrepancies in product description did not result in any benefit, given identical duty rates for the goods. The lack of cross-examination of key witnesses weakened the department's case, leading to the appeal's success and relief for the appellant. en-us Tue, 11 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 17 Dec 2018 06:34:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372012 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, overturning the department's decision. It found no evidence of fraudulent intent as discrepancies in product description did not result in any benefit, given identical duty rates for the goods. The lack of cross-examination of key witnesses weakened the department's case, leading to the appeal's success and relief for the appellant. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 11 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372012