<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (7) TMI 41 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15708</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision regarding the deduction for finance charges under section 36(1)(iii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Court emphasized that the trust was entitled to interest on the outstanding amount, despite past disallowances. The company&#039;s modification of the agreement to limit finance charges to 15% of the outstanding loan amount was deemed valid, leading to a favorable outcome for the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 12:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=54708" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (7) TMI 41 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15708</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision regarding the deduction for finance charges under section 36(1)(iii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Court emphasized that the trust was entitled to interest on the outstanding amount, despite past disallowances. The company&#039;s modification of the agreement to limit finance charges to 15% of the outstanding loan amount was deemed valid, leading to a favorable outcome for the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15708</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>