https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277656 Permission under Section 21(3)(c) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947 for execution of a decree was treated as a regulatory control on payment, not a quasi-judicial adjudication of rights. The provision only enabled the authority to call for documents and information from the decree-holder and judgment-debtor while considering whether permission should be granted; it did not require a formal inquiry, prior notice, or an opportunity of hearing. Because the decree had already settled the parties' rights and liabilities, the grant of permission did not itself affect substantive rights, and the ordinary rule of audi alteram partem did not apply unless the statute expressly required it. en-us Wed, 05 Nov 1969 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 15 Dec 2018 13:26:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277656 Permission under Section 21(3)(c) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947 for execution of a decree was treated as a regulatory control on payment, not a quasi-judicial adjudication of rights. The provision only enabled the authority to call for documents and information from the decree-holder and judgment-debtor while considering whether permission should be granted; it did not require a formal inquiry, prior notice, or an opportunity of hearing. Because the decree had already settled the parties' rights and liabilities, the grant of permission did not itself affect substantive rights, and the ordinary rule of audi alteram partem did not apply unless the statute expressly required it. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 05 Nov 1969 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277656