https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277654 An instrument granting exclusive enjoyment of trees, grass and other produce for more than one year was treated as creating a lease of immoveable property, requiring registration when relied on to affect immoveable rights. However, a contrasting view held that, in a suit limited to standing timber and injunction relief, the same unregistered instrument remained admissible for that confined purpose because standing timber was treated as movable property and the dispute did not concern possession of the tank-bed. The text records a difference of opinion and states that the final result is not conclusive on the material provided. en-us Wed, 17 Jul 1895 00:00:00 +0521 Sat, 15 Dec 2018 12:36:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277654 An instrument granting exclusive enjoyment of trees, grass and other produce for more than one year was treated as creating a lease of immoveable property, requiring registration when relied on to affect immoveable rights. However, a contrasting view held that, in a suit limited to standing timber and injunction relief, the same unregistered instrument remained admissible for that confined purpose because standing timber was treated as movable property and the dispute did not concern possession of the tank-bed. The text records a difference of opinion and states that the final result is not conclusive on the material provided. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 17 Jul 1895 00:00:00 +0521 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277654