<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (8) TMI 36 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15700</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petition, ruling that the petitioner was not entitled to any relief. The Income-tax Officer&#039;s decision to drop the reassessment proceedings was upheld, and the petitioner&#039;s claim for a refund of the advance tax paid was deemed misconceived. The court discharged the rule, affirming that the petitioner could not convert reassessment proceedings into an appeal or revision to seek refunds or reduce tax liability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 11:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=54700" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (8) TMI 36 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15700</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petition, ruling that the petitioner was not entitled to any relief. The Income-tax Officer&#039;s decision to drop the reassessment proceedings was upheld, and the petitioner&#039;s claim for a refund of the advance tax paid was deemed misconceived. The court discharged the rule, affirming that the petitioner could not convert reassessment proceedings into an appeal or revision to seek refunds or reduce tax liability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15700</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>