<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (8) TMI 1126 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277653</link>
    <description>Under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, receipt of compensation under protest is a condition precedent for maintainability of a reference under Section 18. The protest must exist at or before receipt of payment; a later protest, including one raised only in the reference application, is ineffective. The protest need not be in writing and may be oral if proved. A subsequent reference application by itself cannot be treated as proof that compensation was received under protest, because that would defeat the statutory bar in the second proviso to Section 31(2).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2025 14:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=546996" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (8) TMI 1126 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277653</link>
      <description>Under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, receipt of compensation under protest is a condition precedent for maintainability of a reference under Section 18. The protest must exist at or before receipt of payment; a later protest, including one raised only in the reference application, is ineffective. The protest need not be in writing and may be oral if proved. A subsequent reference application by itself cannot be treated as proof that compensation was received under protest, because that would defeat the statutory bar in the second proviso to Section 31(2).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277653</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>