<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (10) TMI 41 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15698</link>
    <description>Reassessment beyond four years under the Income-tax Act is valid only if the statutory conditions for reopening are met, including the proviso to section 147 read with section 149. The assessee must disclose fully and truly all primary facts necessary for assessment; merely filing books or general material is not enough. Where the record did not show disclosure of primary facts relevant to the section 80-I claim, and later information supplied the basis for the Assessing Officer&#039;s belief that income had escaped assessment, the reopening was treated as founded on fresh material and not on a mere change of opinion. The reassessment notices were therefore upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2025 13:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=54698" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (10) TMI 41 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15698</link>
      <description>Reassessment beyond four years under the Income-tax Act is valid only if the statutory conditions for reopening are met, including the proviso to section 147 read with section 149. The assessee must disclose fully and truly all primary facts necessary for assessment; merely filing books or general material is not enough. Where the record did not show disclosure of primary facts relevant to the section 80-I claim, and later information supplied the basis for the Assessing Officer&#039;s belief that income had escaped assessment, the reopening was treated as founded on fresh material and not on a mere change of opinion. The reassessment notices were therefore upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15698</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>