<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 767 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, MAHARASHTRA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371998</link>
    <description>The judgment concluded that the applicant&#039;s direction to transfer businesses qualifies as a &#039;supply&#039; under the GST Act. The value must be determined per Rule 28 of the CGST Rules, 2017. The question of considering notional consideration as open market value was not specifically answered due to Rule 28&#039;s sufficiency.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2025 14:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=546964" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 767 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, MAHARASHTRA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371998</link>
      <description>The judgment concluded that the applicant&#039;s direction to transfer businesses qualifies as a &#039;supply&#039; under the GST Act. The value must be determined per Rule 28 of the CGST Rules, 2017. The question of considering notional consideration as open market value was not specifically answered due to Rule 28&#039;s sufficiency.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371998</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>