<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 763 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371994</link>
    <description>The court held that the re-assessment under Section 147 was impermissible as the Assessing Officer had prior knowledge of the facts. The rectification under Section 154 was deemed invalid as it was based on the misconception that a new company was formed post-amalgamation. The original assessment, including the claim under Section 80HHC, was found to be accurate. The Revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed, and the decisions of the lower authorities were affirmed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2019 10:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=546957" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 763 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371994</link>
      <description>The court held that the re-assessment under Section 147 was impermissible as the Assessing Officer had prior knowledge of the facts. The rectification under Section 154 was deemed invalid as it was based on the misconception that a new company was formed post-amalgamation. The original assessment, including the claim under Section 80HHC, was found to be accurate. The Revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed, and the decisions of the lower authorities were affirmed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371994</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>