<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (4) TMI 46 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15691</link>
    <description>The court interpreted the second proviso to section 23(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, regarding the claim of loss for a new residential unit by the assessee. It clarified that the limitation in the proviso only applies to the annual value under section 23 and not to deductions under section 24. The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling in favor of the assessee and emphasizing that losses from house property income computations can be allowed without restriction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 11:24:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=54691" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (4) TMI 46 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15691</link>
      <description>The court interpreted the second proviso to section 23(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, regarding the claim of loss for a new residential unit by the assessee. It clarified that the limitation in the proviso only applies to the annual value under section 23 and not to deductions under section 24. The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling in favor of the assessee and emphasizing that losses from house property income computations can be allowed without restriction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15691</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>