https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371953 The Tribunal ruled against the appellant, affirming that services provided by M/s. CBRE did not qualify as valid input services under the CENVAT Credit Rules. The judgment emphasized the necessity for services directly or indirectly linked to manufacturing activities to be eligible for CENVAT Credit, highlighting the specific scope of the rule in determining credit eligibility. en-us Fri, 07 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 15 Dec 2018 09:57:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371953 The Tribunal ruled against the appellant, affirming that services provided by M/s. CBRE did not qualify as valid input services under the CENVAT Credit Rules. The judgment emphasized the necessity for services directly or indirectly linked to manufacturing activities to be eligible for CENVAT Credit, highlighting the specific scope of the rule in determining credit eligibility. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 07 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371953