https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371950 Rectification was sought because the earlier Tribunal order decided an incorrect issue, namely credit on outward transportation freight, instead of the actual controversy concerning denial of refund of education cess, higher education cess, and value addition under Notification No. 56/02-CE. The Tribunal accepted that the mistake affected the issue decided in the order dated 30.08.2018 and allowed rectification. The appeal was directed to be relisted for fresh hearing before the next Division Bench so that the correct controversy could be adjudicated on merits. en-us Mon, 03 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 15 Dec 2018 09:57:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371950 Rectification was sought because the earlier Tribunal order decided an incorrect issue, namely credit on outward transportation freight, instead of the actual controversy concerning denial of refund of education cess, higher education cess, and value addition under Notification No. 56/02-CE. The Tribunal accepted that the mistake affected the issue decided in the order dated 30.08.2018 and allowed rectification. The appeal was directed to be relisted for fresh hearing before the next Division Bench so that the correct controversy could be adjudicated on merits. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 03 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371950