https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277642 The court condoned a 29-day delay in filing the revision due to reasons provided. The revisionists were convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing cheques with insufficient funds. Despite arguments on handwriting expert opinion and theft of the cheque book, the court upheld the conviction based on evidence of insufficient funds on the cheques. The court found the evidence of the cheques returning due to insufficient funds and belonging to the accused revisionist to be significant, dismissing the revision. The claim of theft of the cheque book by an employee without a police complaint did not alter the court's decision. en-us Mon, 03 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 15 Dec 2018 06:38:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277642 The court condoned a 29-day delay in filing the revision due to reasons provided. The revisionists were convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing cheques with insufficient funds. Despite arguments on handwriting expert opinion and theft of the cheque book, the court upheld the conviction based on evidence of insufficient funds on the cheques. The court found the evidence of the cheques returning due to insufficient funds and belonging to the accused revisionist to be significant, dismissing the revision. The claim of theft of the cheque book by an employee without a police complaint did not alter the court's decision. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 03 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277642