<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1944 (4) TMI 14 - LAHORE HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277630</link>
    <description>Judgments are relevant only within the limits of Sections 40 to 43 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. A previous judgment is relevant under Section 40 for res judicata or autrefois acquit and autrefois convict, under Section 41 if it is a final judgment in probate, matrimonial, admiralty or insolvency jurisdiction affecting legal status or title, and under Section 42 for matters of public nature; Section 43 excludes all other judgments unless the judgment itself is a fact in issue or otherwise relevant under another provision. Section 11 does not make a civil finding relevant in a later criminal case merely because the facts are similar, since a judgment is an opinion, not itself a fact proving probability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 1944 00:00:00 +0630</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2018 14:50:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=546803" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1944 (4) TMI 14 - LAHORE HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277630</link>
      <description>Judgments are relevant only within the limits of Sections 40 to 43 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. A previous judgment is relevant under Section 40 for res judicata or autrefois acquit and autrefois convict, under Section 41 if it is a final judgment in probate, matrimonial, admiralty or insolvency jurisdiction affecting legal status or title, and under Section 42 for matters of public nature; Section 43 excludes all other judgments unless the judgment itself is a fact in issue or otherwise relevant under another provision. Section 11 does not make a civil finding relevant in a later criminal case merely because the facts are similar, since a judgment is an opinion, not itself a fact proving probability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 1944 00:00:00 +0630</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277630</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>