<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 687 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371918</link>
    <description>The ITAT dismissed the appeals for AY 2006-07 and AY 2007-08, holding that deemed dividends from OEIPL were taxable in the shareholders&#039; hands, not the assessee company&#039;s. The CIT(A)&#039;s jurisdiction to direct taxability to shareholders was upheld. Advances were classified as unsecured loans, not business advances. The order was pronounced on 10/12/2018.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2018 18:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=546731" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 687 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371918</link>
      <description>The ITAT dismissed the appeals for AY 2006-07 and AY 2007-08, holding that deemed dividends from OEIPL were taxable in the shareholders&#039; hands, not the assessee company&#039;s. The CIT(A)&#039;s jurisdiction to direct taxability to shareholders was upheld. Advances were classified as unsecured loans, not business advances. The order was pronounced on 10/12/2018.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371918</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>