<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 669 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371900</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the forfeiture of security deposit and penalty imposition, directing the Commissioner to review the renewal application. The first appeal against license suspension was dismissed as infructuous, while the second appeal was partly allowed, emphasizing the importance of natural justice principles and proper opportunity for a fair hearing in such matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 11:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=546704" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 669 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371900</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the forfeiture of security deposit and penalty imposition, directing the Commissioner to review the renewal application. The first appeal against license suspension was dismissed as infructuous, while the second appeal was partly allowed, emphasizing the importance of natural justice principles and proper opportunity for a fair hearing in such matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371900</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>