<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 665 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371896</link>
    <description>Delay was condoned, but the Supreme Court found no reason to entertain the Special Leave Petition under Article 136 and dismissed it. The order records no substantive adjudication on the central excise dispute; the operative effect is that the petition was not admitted for further consideration, and all pending applications were disposed of.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2018 07:19:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=546699" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 665 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371896</link>
      <description>Delay was condoned, but the Supreme Court found no reason to entertain the Special Leave Petition under Article 136 and dismissed it. The order records no substantive adjudication on the central excise dispute; the operative effect is that the petition was not admitted for further consideration, and all pending applications were disposed of.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371896</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>