<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 658 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371889</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned orders and allowed the appeals with consequential relief, emphasizing the legality of using CENVAT credit for discharging duty liability during the default period, in line with established legal interpretations and court decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2018 07:19:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=546692" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 658 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371889</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned orders and allowed the appeals with consequential relief, emphasizing the legality of using CENVAT credit for discharging duty liability during the default period, in line with established legal interpretations and court decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371889</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>