<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (8) TMI 1163 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277618</link>
    <description>The court granted the petitioner pre-arrest bail under Section 45 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002. The decision was based on factors such as past bail grant, ongoing trial, and compliance with court appearances. The judgment emphasized the need for a case-by-case assessment regarding bail under the Act and highlighted the importance of upholding legal procedures and preventing potential offenses during the trial.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2018 06:40:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=546685" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (8) TMI 1163 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277618</link>
      <description>The court granted the petitioner pre-arrest bail under Section 45 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002. The decision was based on factors such as past bail grant, ongoing trial, and compliance with court appearances. The judgment emphasized the need for a case-by-case assessment regarding bail under the Act and highlighted the importance of upholding legal procedures and preventing potential offenses during the trial.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277618</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>