<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 1477 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277623</link>
    <description>Bail was refused because the charge-sheet materials, including the agreement and emails, showed prima facie involvement of the applicant as a conspirator in a serious economic offence. The investigation was still continuing across multiple States, and the Court found that release could hinder an unhindered inquiry and affect the interests of justice. The proviso relating to women under the Code of Criminal Procedure could be read into Section 439, but it did not create an automatic right to bail. The applicant&#039;s prolonged hospitalisation was also considered, yet it did not outweigh the investigative concerns.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2018 06:40:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=546680" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 1477 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277623</link>
      <description>Bail was refused because the charge-sheet materials, including the agreement and emails, showed prima facie involvement of the applicant as a conspirator in a serious economic offence. The investigation was still continuing across multiple States, and the Court found that release could hinder an unhindered inquiry and affect the interests of justice. The proviso relating to women under the Code of Criminal Procedure could be read into Section 439, but it did not create an automatic right to bail. The applicant&#039;s prolonged hospitalisation was also considered, yet it did not outweigh the investigative concerns.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277623</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>