https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277610 Rule 126-AA(1) authorised a State notification declaring employments essential for public safety or for maintaining community supplies, and the Court held that a notification covering several employments was not invalid merely because it referred to both purposes or a broad class of work. The Governor had formed the requisite opinion, so the declaration was sustained in substance, but veneer mills were not shown on the record to be essential for the stated purposes and were excluded. Rule 126-AA(4) permitted regulation of wages and service conditions in essential employments, yet the power could not be exercised solely on subjective satisfaction; some consultation with affected employers and employees was required. The wage and allowance notifications were therefore invalid. en-us Fri, 07 Apr 1967 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 13 Dec 2018 15:15:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277610 Rule 126-AA(1) authorised a State notification declaring employments essential for public safety or for maintaining community supplies, and the Court held that a notification covering several employments was not invalid merely because it referred to both purposes or a broad class of work. The Governor had formed the requisite opinion, so the declaration was sustained in substance, but veneer mills were not shown on the record to be essential for the stated purposes and were excluded. Rule 126-AA(4) permitted regulation of wages and service conditions in essential employments, yet the power could not be exercised solely on subjective satisfaction; some consultation with affected employers and employees was required. The wage and allowance notifications were therefore invalid. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 07 Apr 1967 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277610