https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277608 Parallel operation charges fixed by Circular No. 687 before the Electricity Regulatory Commission became operational remained valid until superseded or set aside by lawful authority. The tribunal noted that the Board retained tariff-fixing power under the pre-existing regime when the circular was issued, and the later Circular No. 706 did not render the earlier circular void from inception. As a result, charges levied under Circular No. 687 up to 31.08.2000 were recoverable, and the refund claim for that period was unsustainable because the recovery was made under a valid tariff structure then in force. en-us Fri, 28 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 13 Dec 2018 14:11:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277608 Parallel operation charges fixed by Circular No. 687 before the Electricity Regulatory Commission became operational remained valid until superseded or set aside by lawful authority. The tribunal noted that the Board retained tariff-fixing power under the pre-existing regime when the circular was issued, and the later Circular No. 706 did not render the earlier circular void from inception. As a result, charges levied under Circular No. 687 up to 31.08.2000 were recoverable, and the refund claim for that period was unsustainable because the recovery was made under a valid tariff structure then in force. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 28 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277608