<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 652 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371883</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that it lacks jurisdiction to initiate insolvency proceedings against personal guarantors under the Insolvency &amp;amp; Bankruptcy Code (IBC) as Part-III of the Code has not been notified. The applications seeking Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against personal guarantors were dismissed, allowing the Applicant to pursue remedies under existing insolvency laws.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2018 14:07:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=546627" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 652 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371883</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that it lacks jurisdiction to initiate insolvency proceedings against personal guarantors under the Insolvency &amp;amp; Bankruptcy Code (IBC) as Part-III of the Code has not been notified. The applications seeking Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against personal guarantors were dismissed, allowing the Applicant to pursue remedies under existing insolvency laws.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371883</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>