<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 645 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371876</link>
    <description>Transfer of property by a proprietor into a partnership firm was examined under the Gift Tax Act, but the book value recorded in the firm&#039;s accounts was held not to be real consideration for gift tax purposes. The differential between market value and book value could not be assessed as a taxable gift merely because the property was brought into the firm at a lower book value. The underlying principle applied was that a partner&#039;s right in partnership property is not a separate identifiable ownership right while the firm subsists, and the relevant entry in the books does not create a gift. The subject matter was therefore treated as a transfer to the firm, but not as a gift attracting gift tax.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2018 14:06:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=546614" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 645 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371876</link>
      <description>Transfer of property by a proprietor into a partnership firm was examined under the Gift Tax Act, but the book value recorded in the firm&#039;s accounts was held not to be real consideration for gift tax purposes. The differential between market value and book value could not be assessed as a taxable gift merely because the property was brought into the firm at a lower book value. The underlying principle applied was that a partner&#039;s right in partnership property is not a separate identifiable ownership right while the firm subsists, and the relevant entry in the books does not create a gift. The subject matter was therefore treated as a transfer to the firm, but not as a gift attracting gift tax.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371876</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>