<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 637 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371868</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision disallowing the business loss claimed by the assessee under Section 37 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the ruling of the Ld. CIT(A). The Tribunal emphasized the importance of providing concrete evidence and legal compliance to substantiate expenses claimed for business purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2018 14:05:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=546604" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 637 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371868</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision disallowing the business loss claimed by the assessee under Section 37 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the ruling of the Ld. CIT(A). The Tribunal emphasized the importance of providing concrete evidence and legal compliance to substantiate expenses claimed for business purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371868</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>