<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 626 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371857</link>
    <description>Reassessment under section 147 was held invalid where the original scrutiny assessment had already examined the non-charging of interest on a loan to a sister concern, and the assessee&#039;s explanation had been accepted. Because no fresh tangible material emerged after completion of the original assessment, reopening on the same material amounted to a mere change of opinion, which is impermissible. The Tribunal also accepted that the interest was not actually realised and that the commercial reality of the transaction supported the assessee&#039;s treatment on the basis of real income. The notional interest addition therefore did not survive.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2018 14:04:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=546589" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 626 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371857</link>
      <description>Reassessment under section 147 was held invalid where the original scrutiny assessment had already examined the non-charging of interest on a loan to a sister concern, and the assessee&#039;s explanation had been accepted. Because no fresh tangible material emerged after completion of the original assessment, reopening on the same material amounted to a mere change of opinion, which is impermissible. The Tribunal also accepted that the interest was not actually realised and that the commercial reality of the transaction supported the assessee&#039;s treatment on the basis of real income. The notional interest addition therefore did not survive.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371857</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>