<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 1337 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277590</link>
    <description>The Tribunal affirmed the order of the ld.CIT(A), dismissing the appeal of the assessee regarding the disallowance under section 88E of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The correct calculation of rebate under section 88E was crucial in determining the taxable amount, and the Tribunal found that the AO had correctly applied the formula as prescribed in the Act. The appeal was therefore dismissed, and the order was pronounced in open court on 29.6.2016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2018 06:00:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=546565" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 1337 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277590</link>
      <description>The Tribunal affirmed the order of the ld.CIT(A), dismissing the appeal of the assessee regarding the disallowance under section 88E of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The correct calculation of rebate under section 88E was crucial in determining the taxable amount, and the Tribunal found that the AO had correctly applied the formula as prescribed in the Act. The appeal was therefore dismissed, and the order was pronounced in open court on 29.6.2016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277590</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>