<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 1592 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277592</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, ruling that pension payments to retired partners were a diversion of income by overriding title. The Tribunal directed verification and allowance of correct TDS credit and the correct levy of interest under Section 234D. It dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming that advances for services not yet rendered do not constitute income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2018 06:00:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=546563" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 1592 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277592</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, ruling that pension payments to retired partners were a diversion of income by overriding title. The Tribunal directed verification and allowance of correct TDS credit and the correct levy of interest under Section 234D. It dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming that advances for services not yet rendered do not constitute income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277592</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>