<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 1673 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277595</link>
    <description>Service tax paid by a Central Government department through inter-departmental book adjustment was treated as valid discharge of liability where the payment followed departmental instructions and was supported by a CBEC office memorandum. The absence of TR-6 challans for verification did not, by itself, justify treating the tax as unpaid or sustaining a fresh demand for an amount already remitted through the prescribed governmental mechanism. The demand was therefore unsustainable, and the impugned order was set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2019 16:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=546560" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 1673 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277595</link>
      <description>Service tax paid by a Central Government department through inter-departmental book adjustment was treated as valid discharge of liability where the payment followed departmental instructions and was supported by a CBEC office memorandum. The absence of TR-6 challans for verification did not, by itself, justify treating the tax as unpaid or sustaining a fresh demand for an amount already remitted through the prescribed governmental mechanism. The demand was therefore unsustainable, and the impugned order was set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277595</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>