https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277602 Regular bail was granted in a PMLA prosecution because the case rested on documentary material, the petitioner had already spent about seven months in custody, and no substantial progress in trial had been shown after the complaint was filed. The Court treated likely delay in completion of trial as a relevant factor and held that the apprehension of non-appearance was not enough to deny bail, particularly where the petitioner was stated to be a resident of Ludhiana. Bail was therefore allowed subject to appropriate conditions. en-us Mon, 07 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 13 Dec 2018 06:00:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277602 Regular bail was granted in a PMLA prosecution because the case rested on documentary material, the petitioner had already spent about seven months in custody, and no substantial progress in trial had been shown after the complaint was filed. The Court treated likely delay in completion of trial as a relevant factor and held that the apprehension of non-appearance was not enough to deny bail, particularly where the petitioner was stated to be a resident of Ludhiana. Bail was therefore allowed subject to appropriate conditions. Case-Laws Money Laundering Mon, 07 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277602