<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 619 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371850</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the denial of duty exemption benefits due to non-compliance with export obligations under specific notifications. However, it remanded the matter for the computation of duty liability on the depreciated value of capital goods and further examination of entitlement to benefits under a different notification regarding interest payment and penalty imposition. The appeals were disposed of accordingly, with the decision pronounced in court on 10.12.2018.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2018 18:13:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=546548" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 619 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371850</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the denial of duty exemption benefits due to non-compliance with export obligations under specific notifications. However, it remanded the matter for the computation of duty liability on the depreciated value of capital goods and further examination of entitlement to benefits under a different notification regarding interest payment and penalty imposition. The appeals were disposed of accordingly, with the decision pronounced in court on 10.12.2018.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371850</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>