<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (9) TMI 1000 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277582</link>
    <description>The Court rejected the Writ Petition due to lack of territorial jurisdiction, emphasizing the importance of the cause of action for determining the appropriate Court. The Petitioner was granted liberty to approach the correct High Court for further proceedings, in line with legal precedents and Section 35 of the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2018 15:43:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=546515" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (9) TMI 1000 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277582</link>
      <description>The Court rejected the Writ Petition due to lack of territorial jurisdiction, emphasizing the importance of the cause of action for determining the appropriate Court. The Petitioner was granted liberty to approach the correct High Court for further proceedings, in line with legal precedents and Section 35 of the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277582</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>