<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 605 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371836</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court of India in 2018 condoned the delay and granted leave in the case. Justices Abhay Manohar Sapre and Indu Malhotra presided over the matter. The petitioner was represented by Mr. K. Radhakrishna, Sr. Adv., and others, while the respondent was represented by Mr. Kaustubh Mishra, Adv., and others.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2018 13:33:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=546502" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 605 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371836</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court of India in 2018 condoned the delay and granted leave in the case. Justices Abhay Manohar Sapre and Indu Malhotra presided over the matter. The petitioner was represented by Mr. K. Radhakrishna, Sr. Adv., and others, while the respondent was represented by Mr. Kaustubh Mishra, Adv., and others.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371836</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>