<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (3) TMI 628 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277571</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the rejection of books of accounts by the assessing officer, Commissioner (Appeal), and Tribunal due to significant discrepancies in maintaining records. The Court found the discrepancies to be substantial, leading to the conclusion that no substantial question of law was involved, as the decisions of the lower authorities were reasonable and not perverse.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2018 11:01:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=546421" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (3) TMI 628 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277571</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the rejection of books of accounts by the assessing officer, Commissioner (Appeal), and Tribunal due to significant discrepancies in maintaining records. The Court found the discrepancies to be substantial, leading to the conclusion that no substantial question of law was involved, as the decisions of the lower authorities were reasonable and not perverse.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277571</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>