<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 587 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371818</link>
    <description>The Special Leave Petition was dismissed on the ground of low tax effect, so the Court did not decide the substantive dispute. The question of law was expressly left open, preserving the legal issue for future consideration in an appropriate case. Delay in filing was condoned, and the pending application was disposed of.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2018 06:33:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=546396" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 587 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371818</link>
      <description>The Special Leave Petition was dismissed on the ground of low tax effect, so the Court did not decide the substantive dispute. The question of law was expressly left open, preserving the legal issue for future consideration in an appropriate case. Delay in filing was condoned, and the pending application was disposed of.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371818</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>