<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 584 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371815</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the applications for condonation of delay in filing and re-filing the appeal. The Court framed a substantial question of law and remanded the matter to the Tribunal for re-examination of the deposit issue. The Court directed the appellant to file an application for additional evidence regarding substantial cash withdrawals. The remand was limited to the deposit issue and did not include the sale of wearing apparel and silver utensils.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2019 13:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=546393" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 584 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371815</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the applications for condonation of delay in filing and re-filing the appeal. The Court framed a substantial question of law and remanded the matter to the Tribunal for re-examination of the deposit issue. The Court directed the appellant to file an application for additional evidence regarding substantial cash withdrawals. The remand was limited to the deposit issue and did not include the sale of wearing apparel and silver utensils.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371815</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>