<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 579 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371810</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)&#039; decision to add Rs. 14 lakhs under section 68 of the Act due to lack of creditworthiness in accepting unsecured loans. Despite certain deletions in favor of the Assessee for providing primary evidence, the Tribunal dismissed the Assessee&#039;s appeal. Additionally, the Tribunal confirmed the addition of Rs. 3,03,017/- out of inflated unpaid expenses, directing the Assessee to estimate net profit at 2% instead of 1.79% declared, restricting the addition. Both the Revenue&#039;s and Assessee&#039;s appeals were dismissed, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s orders on both issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2018 12:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=546388" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 579 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371810</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)&#039; decision to add Rs. 14 lakhs under section 68 of the Act due to lack of creditworthiness in accepting unsecured loans. Despite certain deletions in favor of the Assessee for providing primary evidence, the Tribunal dismissed the Assessee&#039;s appeal. Additionally, the Tribunal confirmed the addition of Rs. 3,03,017/- out of inflated unpaid expenses, directing the Assessee to estimate net profit at 2% instead of 1.79% declared, restricting the addition. Both the Revenue&#039;s and Assessee&#039;s appeals were dismissed, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s orders on both issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371810</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>