<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 574 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371805</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rectified the order under Sec. 254(2) for the assessment year 2011-12, addressing the correct application of Sec. 206C(1C) and Sec. 206AA provisions. An error in typing a proviso led to the rectification, with the Tribunal directing the Assessing Officer to apply the accurate legal provisions. The Revenue Department&#039;s Miscellaneous Applications were granted, ensuring the proper interpretation of tax collection at source rules for the relevant assessment year.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2018 06:32:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=546383" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 574 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371805</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rectified the order under Sec. 254(2) for the assessment year 2011-12, addressing the correct application of Sec. 206C(1C) and Sec. 206AA provisions. An error in typing a proviso led to the rectification, with the Tribunal directing the Assessing Officer to apply the accurate legal provisions. The Revenue Department&#039;s Miscellaneous Applications were granted, ensuring the proper interpretation of tax collection at source rules for the relevant assessment year.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371805</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>