<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 557 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371788</link>
    <description>A registering authority cannot refuse registration of a sale certificate issued after auction of a secured asset merely because the property had earlier been attached for government dues. Section 31B of the SARFAESI Act accords priority to a secured creditor&#039;s right to realise secured debt over other debts and government dues, and a sale certificate issued under Rule 9(6) after full payment and public auction passes title free from encumbrances where no subsisting encumbrance was disclosed. A subsequent purchaser of the secured asset cannot be burdened with the predecessor&#039;s liability absent a statutory first charge, so the refusal to register was unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2018 08:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=546363" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 557 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371788</link>
      <description>A registering authority cannot refuse registration of a sale certificate issued after auction of a secured asset merely because the property had earlier been attached for government dues. Section 31B of the SARFAESI Act accords priority to a secured creditor&#039;s right to realise secured debt over other debts and government dues, and a sale certificate issued under Rule 9(6) after full payment and public auction passes title free from encumbrances where no subsisting encumbrance was disclosed. A subsequent purchaser of the secured asset cannot be burdened with the predecessor&#039;s liability absent a statutory first charge, so the refusal to register was unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371788</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>