<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 556 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371787</link>
    <description>The court concluded that the investigation and subsequent trial were vitiated due to the conflict of roles played by the Investigating Officer (IO) also being the complainant. Relying on the principles from a Supreme Court judgment, the court acquitted the appellant of the charges, ordering her immediate release unless needed for another case. The court emphasized the necessity of separate roles for the informant and the IO to ensure a fair investigation and trial.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2018 16:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=546362" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 556 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371787</link>
      <description>The court concluded that the investigation and subsequent trial were vitiated due to the conflict of roles played by the Investigating Officer (IO) also being the complainant. Relying on the principles from a Supreme Court judgment, the court acquitted the appellant of the charges, ordering her immediate release unless needed for another case. The court emphasized the necessity of separate roles for the informant and the IO to ensure a fair investigation and trial.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371787</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>