https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371784 The Tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the demands for service tax under Construction of Residential Complex Service and Commercial Construction Service. It held that the construction activities constituted composite works contracts, not falling under CICS or CCS, and should be classified under Works Contract Service. The demands for service tax were deemed unsustainable for periods before and after 01.06.2007, providing consequential benefits to the appellant. en-us Mon, 03 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 10 Dec 2019 17:50:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371784 The Tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the demands for service tax under Construction of Residential Complex Service and Commercial Construction Service. It held that the construction activities constituted composite works contracts, not falling under CICS or CCS, and should be classified under Works Contract Service. The demands for service tax were deemed unsustainable for periods before and after 01.06.2007, providing consequential benefits to the appellant. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 03 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371784